Road Traffic Injury - Recent changes [en]

Diary 2026 continued

Alfas — Wed, 10 Jun 2026 07:03:46 GMT

2026-06-03 07:11

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:03, 10 June 2026
Line 294:		Line 294:
	==== 2026-06-03 07:11 ====		==== 2026-06-03 07:11 ====
	Another sleepless night and nothing is helping.		Another sleepless night and nothing is helping.

			==== 2026-06-10 16:56 ====
			I am calling help lines now every night. It is not possible to go back to sleep otherwise.

			It is bizarre how much energy can be consumed by one phone call. I had one phone for 40 min in the morning and now am spending my time staring at the monitor and not being able to do anything.

Misrepresentation by Peter Livers

Alfas — Wed, 10 Jun 2026 04:59:09 GMT

UPDATE: move relevant information from other pages here

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:59, 10 June 2026
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1,108:		Line 1,108:
	== Impact of Livers actions ==		== Impact of Livers actions ==
	=== Impact on determination ===		=== Impact on determination ===
	[https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Arzi4UrNTw6s_i8hjk5frBFYDd7vbE9m/view?usp=drive_link Certificate of Determination] has many errors. "[https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rP4HZit-rBF0ONjX2ikmuuOEMrnsQcIK/view?usp=drive_link 2023-08-08 An Application to Correct The Obvious Errors in Certificate of Determination.pdf]" ~~list ?? errors~~. Most of these errors are caused by misrepresentation by Livers:		[https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Arzi4UrNTw6s_i8hjk5frBFYDd7vbE9m/view?usp=drive_link Certificate of Determination] has many errors. I asked to correct some in my "[https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rP4HZit-rBF0ONjX2ikmuuOEMrnsQcIK/view?usp=drive_link 2023-08-08 An Application to Correct The Obvious Errors in Certificate of Determination.pdf]". Most of these errors are caused by misrepresentation by Livers:
	''Background section''		''Background section''
	# Item 3. At Mr. Livers’ request, the claim for compensation for gratuitous care was removed and subsequently withdrawn. As a result, I did not receive any support for past or future gratuitous care, which had been calculated at approximately $75,000. ''As mentioned in "[[#Misrepresentation at assessment conference]]"''		# Item 3. At Mr. Livers’ request, the claim for compensation for gratuitous care was removed and subsequently withdrawn. As a result, I did not receive any support for past or future gratuitous care, which had been calculated at approximately $75,000. ''As mentioned in "[[#Misrepresentation at assessment conference]]"''
Line 1,215:		Line 1,215:
	2025-01-07 Dr Louis Ereve letter. The psychiatrist states that my condition is considered likely permanent and is not fully controlled with medication. I experience significant symptoms such as hypervigilance, intrusive traumatic memories, poor memory and concentration, sleep disturbance, emotional distress, and anxiety, which severely impact my daily functioning. [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1f2-0oSAnQznZ9ruJrot-ygllEXvznIsz/view?usp=drive_link]		2025-01-07 Dr Louis Ereve letter. The psychiatrist states that my condition is considered likely permanent and is not fully controlled with medication. I experience significant symptoms such as hypervigilance, intrusive traumatic memories, poor memory and concentration, sleep disturbance, emotional distress, and anxiety, which severely impact my daily functioning. [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1f2-0oSAnQznZ9ruJrot-ygllEXvznIsz/view?usp=drive_link]

	== ~~UPDATE: move~~ relevant information from other pages here ==		== More relevant information from other pages here ==
	* [[2024-02-19 Complaint to OLSC about Peter Livers]]		* [[2024-02-19 Complaint to OLSC about Peter Livers]]
	* [[Peter James Livers solicitor]]		* [[Peter James Livers solicitor]]

Misrepresentation by Peter Livers

Vilma — Wed, 10 Jun 2026 04:55:00 GMT

False promise to go to court

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:55, 10 June 2026
(31 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 749:		Line 749:
	: File: [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Z21lHPMoWn_2JvZujmSwZ-kg_gTj4Hof/view?usp=sharing 2023-06-13 PIC message - part 10 - Ceballos dispute medical expenses]		: File: [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Z21lHPMoWn_2JvZujmSwZ-kg_gTj4Hof/view?usp=sharing 2023-06-13 PIC message - part 10 - Ceballos dispute medical expenses]
	: File: [https://drive.google.com/file/d/14Yqi3GrOLPUyFnMKexx6ENA_43BUL9XA/view?usp=sharing 2023-06-13 Insurer's submissions addressing the claim for non-economic loss and past treatment expenses]		: File: [https://drive.google.com/file/d/14Yqi3GrOLPUyFnMKexx6ENA_43BUL9XA/view?usp=sharing 2023-06-13 Insurer's submissions addressing the claim for non-economic loss and past treatment expenses]

	~~UPDATE: was there anything else about it in emails from Livers or PIC messages?~~

	==== Impact ====		==== Impact ====
Line 758:		Line 756:
	# Non-economic payout reduced		# Non-economic payout reduced
	# Treatment expenses not covered		# Treatment expenses not covered
	~~UPDATE: more details~~
			As a result, no out-of-pocket expenses have been compensated, and both non-economic loss and economic loss have been significantly reduced.

	=== Not provided information about legal costs objection by QBE ===		=== Not provided information about legal costs objection by QBE ===
	~~Update: description~~, ~~evidence~~, cost
	~~Withheld request from PIC about position on legal costs~~, Livers ~~did not inform me that insurance is disputing claim costs~~.		I received $2,500 in compensation for medical report expenses. The maximum possible compensation was $2,712, seems to be based on this table [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xn6HlrVj0SBbV63b560HLqStkL75-LgI/view?usp=sharing Stonis.Costs Calculator.version 1999]. My medical reports cost significantly more, and I could have received the maximum compensation if Livers had provided the correct information.

	'''2023-06-26 PIC message - part 20'''		'''2023-06-26 PIC message - part 20'''
	*The insurer submits its position regarding regulated legal costs.		*The insurer submits its position regarding regulated legal costs.
	*:The Commission confirms receipt and forwards the document to the Member.		*:The Commission confirms receipt and forwards the document to the Member.
	*:link: [https://drive.google.com/file/d/13QGcm1_ZEGLYwZNaMn7JUdZwPUUtVAmX/view?usp=sharing 2023-06-26 PIC message - part 20]		*:link: [https://drive.google.com/file/d/13QGcm1_ZEGLYwZNaMn7JUdZwPUUtVAmX/view?usp=sharing 2023-06-26 PIC message - part 20], [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gTZlYTdKfCc3FcxTUOmlhckjBrhQtyCC/view?usp=sharing 2023-06-26 attachment - 4 - Insurer position on regulated costs]

	~~UPDATE~~: ~~get~~ file 4~~.pdf from PIC, was there anything else about it in emails from Livers or PIC messages?~~

	==== Impact ====		==== Impact ====
	# Some lawyer's fees not covered		# Some lawyer's fees not covered
	# Some legal reports not covered		# Some legal reports not covered
	~~UPDATE~~: ~~more details~~
			=== Did not inform the PIC about the legal expenses ===
			There have been legal medical disbursements, some of which could have been covered by the award, but Livers did not provide this information to the PIC.

			Central Physio and Performance fitness - Alfonsas Stonis: File duplication - $103.00

			Fosters Practice Group - Copy of medical records and clinical notes from Barbara Newton - $62.70

			Fosters Practice Group - Copy of medical records and clinical notes - $345

			Royal Prince Alfred Hospital - Clinical notes - $33

			Stephen Sutton - Report - $750

			Stephen Sutton - Photocopying of documents + postage - $35

			Assess Group - Consultation and report by Sikander Khan - $1,765.51

			Joyce Woon Kum Chiu - Retrieval and Copy of clinical notes/documents - $60

			John Roberts Medico-Legal Services - Consultation - $1804.00

			John Roberts - Medico-legal - $2000

			Peter Wallace Anderson - Report - $330

			Peter Wallace Anderson - Medico-legal - $2640

			2019-10-21 Garry Penhall invoice [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bz4gCl4-TpFBCjoNv3CsANnWwIxzX7MU/view?usp=drive_link]

			2020-05-13 Law Partners Tax Invoice [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bwwc79DtH7IGsprwQfIr0IwAMg5W8des/view?usp=sharing]

			2020-07-07 Peter Wallace Anderson invoice [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gNQmNm6nbz128luBXACwHd2xae9jozbI/view?usp=sharing]

			2020-07-24 Dr Peter Wallace Anderson invoice [https://drive.google.com/file/d/17U-IRTkzUF3x_ZQ9wkOCrR0wjfQ4mU1p/view?usp=sharing]

	=== Refused to provide table of Damages and Costs Calculation ===		=== Refused to provide table of Damages and Costs Calculation ===
Line 820:		Line 851:

	=== False promise to go to court ===		=== False promise to go to court ===
	Mr Livers repeatedly advised me that I should not be concerned about or spend significant effort on the PIC assessment, as he strongly recommended proceeding to court following the assessment. However, after receiving an unfavorable assessment outcome, when I instructed to proceed to court, Mr Livers revealed that he never intended to go to court. Faced with this betrayal I asked Mr Livers for requirements of going to court. Mr Livers urged me to accept the award, as is evident from his emails on 2023-08-07 and 2023-08-22. He was reluctant to respond to my emails in which I sought clarification regarding the prospects of proceeding to court, associated risks and costs, as well as concerns raised about errors in the Certificate of Determination. Mr Livers told me that "he will not allow it" when I instructed him to appeal the PIC decision in court in one of the phone conversations. There was a big problem that Livers was not disputing incorrect statements where Macken was completely flipping facts. ~~UPDATE write more about lies~~ by ~~Macked and where they come from~~. Unable to cope with the pressure, and due to the approaching deadline to retain new legal representation, as well as the deterioration of my mental and physical health, I had no choice but to accept the award, which I did on 30 August 2023.		Mr Livers repeatedly advised me that I should not be concerned about or spend significant effort on the PIC assessment, as he strongly recommended proceeding to court following the assessment. However, after receiving an unfavorable assessment outcome, when I instructed to proceed to court, Mr Livers revealed that he never intended to go to court. Faced with this betrayal I asked Mr Livers for requirements of going to court. Mr Livers urged me to accept the award, as is evident from his emails on 2023-08-07 and 2023-08-22. He was reluctant to respond to my emails in which I sought clarification regarding the prospects of proceeding to court, associated risks and costs, as well as concerns raised about errors in the Certificate of Determination. Mr Livers told me that "he will not allow it" when I instructed him to appeal the PIC decision in court in one of the phone conversations. There was a big problem that Livers was not disputing incorrect statements where Macken was completely flipping facts. At that time, I was not fully aware of how much Macken’s determination was affected by Livers’ misconduct [[#Impact on determination]]. Unable to cope with the pressure, and due to the approaching deadline to retain new legal representation, as well as the deterioration of my mental and physical health, I had no choice but to accept the award, which I did on 30 August 2023.

	[https://roadtrafficinjury.net/email-viewer.php?file=Livers%2Fmessages%2F20230721-Fwd_%20Senior%20Java%20Role%20for%20Alfonsas-147.html 2023-07-21 Asking Livers questions about going to court or continuing the matter]		[https://roadtrafficinjury.net/email-viewer.php?file=Livers%2Fmessages%2F20230721-Fwd_%20Senior%20Java%20Role%20for%20Alfonsas-147.html 2023-07-21 Asking Livers questions about going to court or continuing the matter]

To-Do

Vilma — Wed, 10 Jun 2026 03:21:54 GMT

Case against Livers misrepresantation

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:21, 10 June 2026
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 165:		Line 165:

	== Case against Livers misrepresantation ==		== Case against Livers misrepresantation ==
	Skyrelyje: Withheld information about barrister representationUPDATE: description, evidence first meetings maybe I asked about it again in emails at the beginning, question from PIC close to tribunal [[[[Misrepresentation by Peter Livers#Withheld information about barrister representation]]		Skyrelyje: Withheld information about barrister representationUPDATE: description, evidence first meetings maybe I asked about it again in emails at the beginning, question from PIC close to tribunal [[[Misrepresentation by Peter Livers#Withheld information about barrister representation]]

			== Case against Livers misrepresantation ==
			Skyrelyje: Not provided information about objection by QBE of non-economic and treatment expenses: UPDATE: was there anything else about it in emails from Livers or PIC messages? [[Misrepresentation by Peter Livers#Not provided information about objection by QBE of non-economic and treatment expenses]]

	== Split to stonis.info ==		== Split to stonis.info ==

Misrepresentation by Peter Livers

Vilma — Wed, 10 Jun 2026 03:17:46 GMT

Not provided information about objection by QBE of non-economic and treatment expenses

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:17, 10 June 2026
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 692:		Line 692:
	=== Withheld information about barrister representation ===		=== Withheld information about barrister representation ===
	I asked Livers about barrister representation and fees when I met Livers for the first time. Livers told me that he will not charge more for his service than I will receive for his part from the PIC but the barrister might be different. He told me that he works with one barrister who most likely will accept these conditions, but he can not guarantee. He told me that he will contact the barrister and provide me with more information when preparing for the hearing (PIC Assessment Conference).		I asked Livers about barrister representation and fees when I met Livers for the first time. Livers told me that he will not charge more for his service than I will receive for his part from the PIC but the barrister might be different. He told me that he works with one barrister who most likely will accept these conditions, but he can not guarantee. He told me that he will contact the barrister and provide me with more information when preparing for the hearing (PIC Assessment Conference).

	~~UPDATE: description, evidence first meetings maybe I asked about it again in emails at the beginning, question from PIC close to tribunal~~

	; 2023-06-22 PIC message		; 2023-06-22 PIC message
Line 709:		Line 707:

	=== Not provided information about objection by QBE of non-economic and treatment expenses ===		=== Not provided information about objection by QBE of non-economic and treatment expenses ===
	~~Update: add reference to award with none of out of pocket expenses covered and most Medicare expenses denied.~~

	Ceballos statements in documents submitted on 2023-06-13 contain lots of lies and misleading information. Livers was aware of it, but did not inform me about this document and therefore I had no chance to expose these lies. As a result it severely damaged my claim.		Ceballos statements in documents submitted on 2023-06-13 contain lots of lies and misleading information. Livers was aware of it, but did not inform me about this document and therefore I had no chance to expose these lies. As a result it severely damaged my claim.
Line 742:		Line 739:
	## (a) The amount $3,921.80 is actually out-of-pocket treatment and related to the injury; therefore, the incorrect statements should have been contested. The amount of $4,133.51 was mentioned incorrectly.		## (a) The amount $3,921.80 is actually out-of-pocket treatment and related to the injury; therefore, the incorrect statements should have been contested. The amount of $4,133.51 was mentioned incorrectly.
	# '''Item 9'''. If all the errors had been corrected, the amount of $15,167.65 should have been covered.		# '''Item 9'''. If all the errors had been corrected, the amount of $15,167.65 should have been covered.




	Livers said that medical expenses has to be a part of the statement only at the very last minute when the statement already had to be sent to PIC. Previous lawyers kept it separate, so it was very unexpected. Livers did not inform me that QBE disputed medical expenses. During the AC Livers misinformed that this is only about Medicare expenses. After AC Livers have not replied what information is needed for medical expenses and refused to provide any advice or examples. This was in stark contrast to his claims that he has been doing PI claims for many years as a main part of his job. As a result:		Livers said that medical expenses has to be a part of the statement only at the very last minute when the statement already had to be sent to PIC. Previous lawyers kept it separate, so it was very unexpected. Livers did not inform me that QBE disputed medical expenses. During the AC Livers misinformed that this is only about Medicare expenses. After AC Livers have not replied what information is needed for medical expenses and refused to provide any advice or examples. This was in stark contrast to his claims that he has been doing PI claims for many years as a main part of his job. As a result:
	#'''No out of pocket treatment expenses have been compensated'''		#'''No out of pocket treatment expenses have been compensated'''
	#'''Future medical expenses have been significantly reduced'''.		#'''Future medical expenses have been significantly reduced'''.

			[https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Arzi4UrNTw6s_i8hjk5frBFYDd7vbE9m/view?usp=sharing 2023-07-20 PIC Certificate of Determination]

	; 2023-06-13 : Ceballos uploaded a dispute of medical expenses. There was no response from Livers.		; 2023-06-13 : Ceballos uploaded a dispute of medical expenses. There was no response from Livers.

To-Do

Vilma — Wed, 10 Jun 2026 03:10:35 GMT

Case against Livers misrepresantation

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:10, 10 June 2026
Line 162:		Line 162:
	== Case against Livers misrepresantation ==		== Case against Livers misrepresantation ==
	* Skyrelyje: Did not dispute lies by Moodley: PAPILDYTI:Informavau Livers apie melus, o jis sakė kad ta ataskaita nebus naudojama ir nereikia pateikt jokios info. "[[Misrepresentation by Peter Livers#Did not dispute lies by Moodley]]"		* Skyrelyje: Did not dispute lies by Moodley: PAPILDYTI:Informavau Livers apie melus, o jis sakė kad ta ataskaita nebus naudojama ir nereikia pateikt jokios info. "[[Misrepresentation by Peter Livers#Did not dispute lies by Moodley]]"


			== Case against Livers misrepresantation ==
			Skyrelyje: Withheld information about barrister representationUPDATE: description, evidence first meetings maybe I asked about it again in emails at the beginning, question from PIC close to tribunal [[[[Misrepresentation by Peter Livers#Withheld information about barrister representation]]

	== Split to stonis.info ==		== Split to stonis.info ==

Misrepresentation by Peter Livers

Vilma — Wed, 10 Jun 2026 03:09:38 GMT

Withheld information about barrister representation

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:09, 10 June 2026
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 258:		Line 258:

	=== Did not dispute lies by Moodley ===		=== Did not dispute lies by Moodley ===
	~~PAPILDYTI:Informavau Livers apie melus, o jis sakė kad ta ataskaita nebus naudojama ir nereikia pateikt jokios info.~~

	In the report provided by psychologist Ms Moodley some of her claims are physically impossible (e.g., timing and location inconsistencies) and factually incorrect.		In the report provided by psychologist Ms Moodley some of her claims are physically impossible (e.g., timing and location inconsistencies) and factually incorrect.
Line 317:		Line 316:

	=== Livers missed the deadline to upload provided documents ===		=== Livers missed the deadline to upload provided documents ===
	~~Update: rearrange with previous one so that one is about misrepresentation and another about delays~~

	~~X number~~ of documents provided were missing from the final PIC submission, primarily concerning my employment status, return to work activity and medical records. ~~Some (e~~.~~g see below UP TO HERE~~ have ~~pages removed,~~ and ~~others are completely missing~~.		Rather than uploading everything on time, he manually corrected the date to make it appear that I had submitted my submission later.

			31 of documents provided were missing from the final PIC submission, primarily concerning my employment status, return to work activity and medical records.
			4 documents are missing important pages.
			2 documents have altered dates.
			Around 8 attachments are hard to read due to careless scanning.
			Original documents were provided in PDF format and were easy to read and possible to search. Livers scanned these documents making it way more difficult to read.

	Livers was asked to provide responses to QBE applications by messages.		Livers was asked to provide responses to QBE applications by messages.
Line 348:		Line 352:
	* 4 documents are missing important pages		* 4 documents are missing important pages
	* changed date in some documents manually (dates of the 2 statements)		* changed date in some documents manually (dates of the 2 statements)
	* XX attachments are hard to read due to careless scanning		* around 8 attachments are hard to read due to careless scanning
	* Original documents were provided in PDF format and were easy to read and possible to search. Livers scanned these documents making it way more difficult to read.		* Original documents were provided in PDF format and were easy to read and possible to search. Livers scanned these documents making it way more difficult to read.

Line 702:		Line 706:

	==== Impact ====		==== Impact ====
	~~UPDATE:~~		Livers completely misrepresented matters during the preparation and at the assessment conference. Having a barrister would have helped prevent this type of issue. It is the role of counsel to represent a claim during such proceedings. Not having a barrister was a significant disadvantage.

	=== Not provided information about objection by QBE of non-economic and treatment expenses ===		=== Not provided information about objection by QBE of non-economic and treatment expenses ===

To-Do

Vilma — Wed, 10 Jun 2026 02:53:26 GMT

Case against Livers misrepresantation

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:53, 10 June 2026
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 158:		Line 158:

	== Case against Livers misrepresantation ==		== Case against Livers misrepresantation ==
	* Not disputed lies skyrelyje: Full list is provided on google drive. UPDATE: upload updated list. [[Not disputed lies]]		* Not disputed lies skyrelyje: Full list is provided on google drive. UPDATE: upload updated list. "[[Misrepresentation by Peter Livers#Not disputed lies]]"

			== Case against Livers misrepresantation ==
			* Skyrelyje: Did not dispute lies by Moodley: PAPILDYTI:Informavau Livers apie melus, o jis sakė kad ta ataskaita nebus naudojama ir nereikia pateikt jokios info. "[[Misrepresentation by Peter Livers#Did not dispute lies by Moodley]]"

	== Split to stonis.info ==		== Split to stonis.info ==