OLSC denied request for information: Difference between revisions
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Summary == | == Summary == | ||
# I submitted complaints about lawyers Potts, Pryde, de Luca-Leonard, Campbell, Livers, Ceballos | # I submitted complaints about lawyers Potts, Pryde, [[ Complaint to OLSC about solicitor Moya de Luca-Leonard | de Luca-Leonard ]], [[ Complaint to OLSC about barrister Michelle Campbell | Campbell ]], [[2024-02-19 Complaint to OLSC about Peter Livers | Livers]], [[2024-04-14 Complaint to OLSC about solicitor Timothy Ceballos | Ceballos]] | ||
# OLSC dismissed my complains and in the dismissals they relied on replies from lawyers. | # OLSC dismissed my complains and in the dismissals they relied on replies from lawyers. | ||
# OLSC did not provide me any information about responses from lawyers | # OLSC did not provide me any information about responses from lawyers | ||
Latest revision as of 01:26, 12 May 2026
OLSC seems to be very corrupt organisation that protect dodgy lawyers instead of keeping them accountable for their misconduct.
Summary
- I submitted complaints about lawyers Potts, Pryde, de Luca-Leonard , Campbell , Livers, Ceballos
- OLSC dismissed my complains and in the dismissals they relied on replies from lawyers.
- OLSC did not provide me any information about responses from lawyers
- This creates unequal situation where lawyers are given unfair advantage, they get my complains, but I do not get any of their responses
- I submitted a GIPA application 2026-01-19 RTI2627934-20260119214224.pdf asking for lawyers' responses to my complaints. There has been no response yet. (Point 6)
- The OLSC complaint management process lacks basic transparency. The lawyers I complain get my complaints, but I can not get their responses, while it impacts the OLSC decision.
Communication with OLSC timeline
- 2026-01-19
- I submitted a GIPA application 2026-01-19 RTI2627934-20260119214224.pdf