Analysis of 2021-04-29 reply submissions: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "This document provide a list incorrect statements in submissions in reply to application for panel review for medical assessment. The list of errors in application is provided in separated document "2021-04-26 appealComments.pdf"") |
m (Alfas moved page 2021-04-29 reply submissions analysis to Analysis of 2021-04-29 reply submissions) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This document provide a list incorrect statements in submissions in reply to application for panel review for medical assessment. The list of errors in application is provided in separated document "2021-04-26 appealComments.pdf" | This document provide a list incorrect statements in submissions in reply to application for panel review for medical assessment. The list of errors in application is provided in separated document "2021-04-26 appealComments.pdf" | ||
# Item 12. "''... Further, it is not uncommon for there to be slight inconsistencies in histories provided by a claimant give the passage of time. ...''" However, there were inconsistencies, but reply submission give impression that there are. | |||
The only inconsistencies are in Mr Ceballos statements as he takes parts of history statements and presents them as conflicting. | |||
The full work |
Latest revision as of 14:00, 26 November 2023
This document provide a list incorrect statements in submissions in reply to application for panel review for medical assessment. The list of errors in application is provided in separated document "2021-04-26 appealComments.pdf"
- Item 12. "... Further, it is not uncommon for there to be slight inconsistencies in histories provided by a claimant give the passage of time. ..." However, there were inconsistencies, but reply submission give impression that there are.
The only inconsistencies are in Mr Ceballos statements as he takes parts of history statements and presents them as conflicting.
The full work