Analysis of Law Partners itemised bill: Difference between revisions

From Road Traffic Injury
(Created page with " <p>This short analysis of Law Partners itemized bill as a part of problem of <a href="legal_fees.html">exaggerated legal fees</a>. Itemized bill has 26 items. Lets go one by one and see what they are realy charging for. The analysis is based on the information that I have. If I will find any additional information I will update this fee analsys. These fees seem exceptionaly unfair and just a part of Law Partners scam. I will write additional information about pain an...")
 
No edit summary
Line 195: Line 195:
     </table>
     </table>
      
      
    <h2>Emotional impact</h2>
<h2>Emotional impact</h2>
    Exaggeration of the cost by Law Partners goes beyond any expectations. I would never expect that lawyers would go breaking the law so brutaly. They double charge for most of the activities even if it can be proven to be wrong by checking the contract. However, they were so convinced that they will get away with it that they do not bother about it. Such criminal activity might seem strange, but you have to take into account that they know that I have PTSD and I am not able to deal with these things. Anything related to injury causes panic attacks and my braing shutting down. I was retraumatized by this injustice. I think that was exactly they purpose. This is why they went to such absurd false claims. I will not be able to defend myself if they manage to cause significant damage to my mental health. And their plan worked. They did cause significant damage. I am going through their bill only after 3 years of intense teraphy and still struguling to cope with it. Unfortunately I have spend several months just on this bill as it is so unfair and stressful. I am stuck with it: can not get it out of my mind and can not deal with it.
Exaggeration of the cost by Law Partners goes beyond any expectations. I would never expect that lawyers would go breaking the law so brutaly. They double charge for most of the activities even if it can be proven to be wrong by checking the contract. However, they were so convinced that they will get away with it that they do not bother about it. Such criminal activity might seem strange, but you have to take into account that they know that I have PTSD and I am not able to deal with these things. Anything related to injury causes panic attacks and my braing shutting down. I was retraumatized by this injustice. I think that was exactly they purpose. This is why they went to such absurd false claims. I will not be able to defend myself if they manage to cause significant damage to my mental health. And their plan worked. They did cause significant damage. I am going through their bill only after 3 years of intense teraphy and still struguling to cope with it. Unfortunately I have spend several months just on this bill as it is so unfair and stressful. I am stuck with it: can not get it out of my mind and can not deal with it.

Revision as of 01:22, 24 October 2023

This short analysis of Law Partners itemized bill as a part of problem of <a href="legal_fees.html">exaggerated legal fees</a>. Itemized bill has 26 items. Lets go one by one and see what they are realy charging for. The analysis is based on the information that I have. If I will find any additional information I will update this fee analsys. These fees seem exceptionaly unfair and just a part of Law Partners scam. I will write additional information about pain and suffering it caused me. However, for this I will need help of psychologist and other supporting people.

Summary

  1. Charge for all phone calls twice: as part of other items and additionaly individualy just calls, even if by the contract they were already covered by other items and should not be charged additionaly (items: <a href="#1">1</a>, <a href="#2">2</a>, <a href="#3">3</a>).
  2. Charge for the tasks they have not performed, but simply asked client to provide final information (item <a href="#4">4</a>).


Itimized bill analysis

Note:

  • italic - text from Law Partners itemized bill
  • bold italic - text from Law Partners contract.

Item. Fee code Description Bill Amount Corrected Amount
1. B Telephone Attendances (10 @ $50.00)
To/From Client:, 30/05/18, 14/06/18, 27/09/18, 12/03/19, 3/05/19, 29/10/19, 30/10/19, 4/02/20, 8/05/20 (x2),
500.00 0
B - from contract Telephone attendence. Each telephone attendence not directly related to other items in this schedule.
Data
               Dr Stonis call history.
DateDurationType
2018-05-30no record found
2018-06-14no record found
2018-09-2738sOutgoing
2019-03-126m 17sOutgoing
2019-05-036m 29sOutgoing
2019-10-294m 0sOutgoing
2019-10-301m 34sOutgoing
2020-02-045m 34sOutgoing
2020-05-081m 23sOutgoing
               Total 25m 55s.	
Analysis
  1. All call are drectly related to other items and should not be duplicated here.
  2. There is only 1 call in call history on 2020-05-08.
2. B Telephone Attendances (10 @ $50.00)
To/From third parties: 26/04/18, 30/05/18, 18/07/18, 23/07/18, 15/08/18, 26/11/18, 10/01/19, 25/10/19, 13/11/19, 7/01/20
500.00 0
Analysis
  1. There is no records of these calls being made.
  2. All Law Partners activities related to the claim are covered by other items. If some calls were made they should be covered by other items from fees list.
3. B Telephone Attendances (5 @ $50.00)
To/From McInnes Wilson Lawyers: 29/1/20 (x2), 17/03/20, 6/05/20 (x2)
250.00 0
Analysis
  1. There is no records of these calls being made.
  2. All Law Partners activities related to the claim are covered by other items. If some calls were made they should be covered by other items from fees list.
4. F Centrelink (Repayment) Estimate (1 @ $90.00): 22/10/19 90.00 0
F - from contract Centrelink (repayment estimate). All activities required to optain repayment / payback estimate from Centrelink (including, for example, correspondence, copletion of estimate forms, telephone attendances and advice to you).
Analysis
  1. The estimate and amount received was provided to Gillian Potts.
  2. There is no record of any estimate done by Potts.
5. G General Correspondence: (132 @ $180.00)
To/from Client: 16/04/18, 28/04/18, 1/05/18, 7/05/18, 10/05/18, 15/5/18 (x2), 30/05/18, 6/06/18, 11/06/18, 14/06/18, 17/06/18, 18/06/18, 5/07/18, 9/07/18, 10/07/18, 18/07/18 (x2), 19/07/18, 26/07/18, 3/8/18 (x2), 4/09/18 (x2), 2/10/18, 4/10/18, 11/10/18, 26/11/18, 29/11/18, 17/12/18, 8/01/19, 17/01/19, 9/03/19, 12/03/19, 16/03/19 (x2), 18/03/19, 25/03/19, 28/03/19, 3/04/19 (x2), 17/04/19 (x2), 18/04/18 (x4), 21/04/19, 22/04/19(x2), 23/04/19, 24/04/19, 28/04/19, 29/04/19 (x5), 30/04/19 (x4), 2/05/19, 22/05/19 (x2), 8/07/19, 9/07/19 (x3), 11/07/19, 18/07/19 (x2), 20/08/19, 26/08/19, 25/09/19, 30/809/19, 1/10/19 (x2), 2/10/19 (x2), 3/10/19 (x2), 4/10/19, 8/10/19, 14/10/19, 17/10/19, 24/10/19 (x2), 27/10/19, 25/10/19, 27/10/19 (x2), 28/10/19, 29/10/19 (x2), 30/10/19, 4/11/19, 6/11/19, 9/12/19, 17/12/19, 19/12/19 (x2), 26/12/19, 8/01/20, 9/01/20, 20/01/20, 4/02/20, 5/02/20, 2/03/20, 3/03/20, 17/03/20, 18/03/20, 20/03/20, 14/04/20, 23/04/20 (x2), 24/04/20, 28/04/20 (x2), 29/04/20 (x2), 6/05/20 (x3), 7/05/20 (x3), 8/05/20 (x3), 11/05/20
23,760.00 0
G - from contract General corresponcence. Drafting, reviewing and finalising each general incoming and outgoing correspondence not directly related to other items in this schedule.
Data
               Dr Stonis call history.
                   3/04/19 (x2), 17/04/19 (x2), 18/04/18 (x4), 21/04/19, 22/04/19(x2), 23/04/19, 24/04/19, 28/04/19, 29/04/19 (x5), 30/04/19 (x4), 2/05/19, 22/05/19 (x2), 8/07/19, 9/07/19 (x3), 11/07/19, 18/07/19 (x2), 20/08/19, 26/08/19, 25/09/19, 30/809/19, 1/10/19 (x2), 2/10/19 (x2), 3/10/19 (x2), 4/10/19, 8/10/19, 14/10/19, 17/10/19, 24/10/19 (x2), 27/10/19, 25/10/19, 27/10/19 (x2), 28/10/19, 29/10/19 (x2), 30/10/19, 4/11/19, 6/11/19, 9/12/19, 17/12/19, 19/12/19 (x2), 26/12/19, 8/01/20, 9/01/20, 20/01/20, 4/02/20, 5/02/20, 2/03/20, 3/03/20, 17/03/20, 18/03/20, 20/03/20, 14/04/20, 23/04/20 (x2), 24/04/20, 28/04/20 (x2), 29/04/20 (x2), 6/05/20 (x3), 7/05/20 (x3), 8/05/20 (x3), 11/05/20
DateSent / ReceivedBrief descriptionRelated itemFee based on the contract
2018-04-16-there were no emails on this day0
2018-04-28SentShort list of injuries for Alfonsas Stonis caseIntended for items 30 and 33. Law Partners did not pass this information to MAS or doctors.0
2018-05-07not foundPotts asking for a list of treating doctorsItem 90
2018-05-10SentEmail with Steve Sutton contacs and sugesting that Sutton can write a report.Item 170
2018-05-15 08:32ReceivedConfirmation that Steve Sutton contacs received, but she will ask only for the clinical notes.Item 170
2018-05-15 17:54SentSigned Authority to Release Information.Items 4, 8, 90
2018-05-31ReceivedNote about appointment with Potts and Pryde.Item 250
2018-06-05 2018-06-06SentFilled Medicare service forms and unanswered question about it.Item 80
2018-06-11SentList of house hold task Juste helps me with.Items 18, 28, 33. Law Partners did not pass this information to MAS or doctors.0
2018-06-14ReceivedRequest for information about loss of income.Item 18.0
2018-06-17SentQuestion about medical dental treatment and information about effects on drop of hygiene.Inteded for items 27, 28, 32, 33. Low partners did not created following items and failed to include in others.0
2018-06-18ReceivedShrot reply to question about medical dental treatment to keep records.Inteded for items 27, 28, 32, 33. Low partners did not created following items and failed to include in others.0
2018-07-05 (duplicate on 2018-07-10)ReceivedNote about appointment with Dr Khan.Item 33.0
2018-07-09-there were no emails on this day0
2018-07-10 (duplicate of 2018-07-05)ReceivedNote about appointment with Dr Khan.Item 33.0
2018-07-18Sent, ReceivedNotice and reply about traveling overseas for month.It does not require actions listed in contract (drafting, reviewing and finalising).0
2018-07-19-there were no emails on this day0
2018-07-26-there were no emails on this day0
2018-08-03Sent, ReceivedQuestion: should psychologist Sutton send his clinical notes to QBE. Answer: Potts will have a look at it.Item 170
2018-09-04Sent, ReceivedSimple question about including dental treatment in economic loss. Answer: to provide more info and was the damaged sustained during the injury.Items 18, 32. It was not included in one and another not prepared. This also was simple question, that did not require actions listed for G category.0
2018-10-02 (2018-07-05, 2018-07-10)ReceivedTime change for appintment with Dr KhanItem 330
2018-10-04-there were no emails on this day0
2018-10-11 (2018-07-05, 2018-07-10, 2018-10-02)SentReply to time change for appintment with Dr KhanItem 330
2018-11-26ReceivedAsking for contacs supplied on 2018-09-04.Inteded for items 18, 27, 28, 32, 33. Low partners did not created following items and failed to include in others.0
2018-11-29SentRe to 2018-11-26. Info on dental treatment.Inteded for items 18, 27, 28, 32, 33. Low partners did not created following items and failed to include in others.0
2018-12-17-there were no emails on this day0
2019-01-08ReceivedLetter from Pryde saying that he had a look at clinical notes and Dr Khan report.Items 17, 25, 330
2019-01-17 (email date 2019-01-14)ReceivedNote about appointment with Dr Roberts.Item 330
2019-03-09SentMedicare form.Item 8.0
2019-03-12ReceivedRe Medicare form.Item 8.0
2019-03-16Sent, ReceivedList of GP visited before injury and confirmation of email received.Item 8, 9.0
2019-03-18SentInforming about upcoming travel overseas.It does not require actions listed in contract (drafting, reviewing and finalising).0
2019-03-25-there were no emails on this day0
2019-03-29 (email received at 2019-03-28)ReceivedCopy of Dr Roberts report.Item 33.0
2019-03-29 (email received at 2019-03-28)ReceivedCopy of Dr Roberts report.Item 33.0
               Total $0.	
Analysis
  1. The estimate and amount received was provided to Gillian Potts.
  2. There is no record of any estimate done by Potts.

Emotional impact

Exaggeration of the cost by Law Partners goes beyond any expectations. I would never expect that lawyers would go breaking the law so brutaly. They double charge for most of the activities even if it can be proven to be wrong by checking the contract. However, they were so convinced that they will get away with it that they do not bother about it. Such criminal activity might seem strange, but you have to take into account that they know that I have PTSD and I am not able to deal with these things. Anything related to injury causes panic attacks and my braing shutting down. I was retraumatized by this injustice. I think that was exactly they purpose. This is why they went to such absurd false claims. I will not be able to defend myself if they manage to cause significant damage to my mental health. And their plan worked. They did cause significant damage. I am going through their bill only after 3 years of intense teraphy and still struguling to cope with it. Unfortunately I have spend several months just on this bill as it is so unfair and stressful. I am stuck with it: can not get it out of my mind and can not deal with it.