Timothy Ceballos: Difference between revisions

From Road Traffic Injury
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Timothy Ceballos represent QBE in my personal injury claim. I was surprised by the style of his work. He basically relies on absurd lies. I was looking at one of documents he sent to Personal Injury Commission, and I was surprised that it has a declaration that he is writing correct information. He:
Timothy Ceballos represent QBE in my [[2015-03-30 road traffic injury | personal injury claim]]. I was surprised by the style of his work. He basically relies on absurd lies. I was looking at one of documents he sent to Personal Injury Commission, and I was surprised that it has a declaration that he is writing correct information. He:
* misquoted text changing meaning to opposite;
* misquoted text changing meaning to opposite;
* invented to things that were not in the documents mentioned;
* invented to things that were not in the documents mentioned;
* is inconsistent with his own statements.
* is inconsistent with his own statements.
In some bizarre twist my solicitors refused to dispute any of these lies saying that they have a deal (not many details given) or (in another instance) that they are good friends and do not want to negatively affect his carrier.
In some bizarre twist my solicitors refused to dispute any of these lies saying that they have a deal (not many details given) or (in another instance) that they are good friends and do not want to negatively affect his carrier.

Revision as of 23:52, 20 November 2023

Timothy Ceballos represent QBE in my personal injury claim. I was surprised by the style of his work. He basically relies on absurd lies. I was looking at one of documents he sent to Personal Injury Commission, and I was surprised that it has a declaration that he is writing correct information. He:

  • misquoted text changing meaning to opposite;
  • invented to things that were not in the documents mentioned;
  • is inconsistent with his own statements.

In some bizarre twist my solicitors refused to dispute any of these lies saying that they have a deal (not many details given) or (in another instance) that they are good friends and do not want to negatively affect his carrier.