Timothy Ceballos: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* is inconsistent with his own statements. | * is inconsistent with his own statements. | ||
In some bizarre twist my solicitors refused to dispute any of these lies saying that they have a deal (not many details given) or (in another instance) that they are good friends and do not want to negatively affect his carrier. | In some bizarre twist my solicitors refused to dispute any of these lies saying that they have a deal (not many details given) or (in another instance) that they are good friends and do not want to negatively affect his carrier. | ||
I have seen Ceballos only once at [[PIC Assessment Conference 2023-06-28]]. I was surprised how excited he was to urge QBE barrister to put forward statements that would require me to have teleportation device and time travel. The barrister did not go so low and ignored Ceballos urges even with full support of PIC member. | |||
Revision as of 00:20, 21 November 2023
Timothy Ceballos represent QBE in my personal injury claim. I was surprised by the style of his work. He basically relies on absurd lies. I was looking at one of documents he sent to Personal Injury Commission, and I was surprised that it has a declaration that he is writing correct information. He:
- misquoted text changing meaning to opposite;
- invented to things that were not in the documents mentioned;
- is inconsistent with his own statements.
In some bizarre twist my solicitors refused to dispute any of these lies saying that they have a deal (not many details given) or (in another instance) that they are good friends and do not want to negatively affect his carrier.
I have seen Ceballos only once at PIC Assessment Conference 2023-06-28. I was surprised how excited he was to urge QBE barrister to put forward statements that would require me to have teleportation device and time travel. The barrister did not go so low and ignored Ceballos urges even with full support of PIC member.