Case against Peter Livers

Peter James Livers solicitor misrepresented me during PIC Assessment Conference making the award significantly lower sum for damages. He also misinformed me multiple times. This page follows and influence my guide on challenging lawyers misconduct in court.

Collecting information

When dealing with Livers misconduct there are a few main sources of evidence:

1. Communication with Livers
   1. Emails from/to Livers
   2. Documents given to me by Livers
   3. Meetings with Livers
   4. Phone calls
2. Livers actions on my behalf
   1. PIC archives: messages on the system, record of assessment conference

What went wrong

Page Misrepresentation by Peter Livers has full list of things done wrong by Livers. Mainly it falls into these 3 categories:

1. Misrepresentation during claim process that resulted in significant reduction of potential award for damages
2. Providing false information and ignoring personal instructions.
3. Gross exaggeration of fees, breaching the contract

Estimated damage caused by Livers

Estimate provided in a page Impact of Peter Livers misconduct, additionally, summarised:

1. Damage to the claim $541,521.48
2. Non-economic loss $150,000.
3. Loss of income due to CTPSD and Time lost $500,000
4. Additional treatment expenses $5,000

Total of $1,311,193
Average interest in Australia = 5.075%
Total Interest = $66,543
Total = $1,311,19

Interest lost

1. Exaggerated fees $17,369.49 at rate of 4.25% from money kept in trust fund.
2. Damage to PI claim $66,543

Total including interest $1,395.11