OLSC denied request for information: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:21, 12 May 2026

OLSC seems to be very corrupt organisation that protect dodgy lawyers instead of keeping them accountable for their misconduct.

I submitted complaints about lawyers Potts, Pryde, de Luca-Leonard, Campbell, Livers, Ceballos
OLSC dismissed my complains and in the dismissals they relied on replies from lawyers.
OLSC did not provide me any information about responses from lawyers
This creates unequal situation where lawyers are given unfair advantage, they get my complains, but I do not get any of their responses
I submitted a GIPA application 2026-01-19 RTI2627934-20260119214224.pdf asking for lawyers' responses to my complaints. There has been no response yet. (Point 6)
The OLSC complaint management process lacks basic transparency. The lawyers I complain get my complaints, but I can not get their responses, while it impacts the OLSC decision.

2026-01-19: I submitted a GIPA application 2026-01-19 RTI2627934-20260119214224.pdf

Revision as of 01:19, 12 May 2026 (view source) Alfas (talk \| contribs) (→‎Communication with OLSC timeline) ← Older edit		Revision as of 01:21, 12 May 2026 (view source) Alfas (talk \| contribs) (→‎Communication with OLSC timeline) Newer edit →
Line 11:		Line 11:

	== Communication with OLSC timeline ==		== Communication with OLSC timeline ==
	I submitted a GIPA application [https://drive.google.com/open?id=1fNENlRNf9aSsx9Uy_-KmibxfLANPK8Aj&usp=drive_copy <span class="underline">2026-01-19 RTI2627934-20260119214224.pdf</span>]		; 2026-01-19 : I submitted a GIPA application [https://drive.google.com/open?id=1fNENlRNf9aSsx9Uy_-KmibxfLANPK8Aj&usp=drive_copy <span class="underline">2026-01-19 RTI2627934-20260119214224.pdf</span>]