Peter James Livers solicitor

Peter James Livers is a solicitor from Slattery Thompson law firm, that represented me at PIC Assessment Conference 2023-06-28. It went terribly bad, and I doubt I will be able to fix it. All I can do now is to try to get some justice, so that other people do not suffer same way.

There was action by Livers that can be identified as professional misconduct. However, these actions differ a lot in their impact. For some corruption is the only logical explanation I can come up with, however some still can be explained by simple negligence.

I spend almost a year collecting and providing missing information for my claim. However, I got a result that was even worse that previous bad result. Livers played major role in

Summary

Actions that can be explained only by corruption:

1. Ceballos (QBE solicitor) submitted lots of absurd lies to PIC about my functioning before and after the injury.
2. I provided detailed evidences to Livers that showed how incorrect Ceballos statements are.
3. Livers promised to include these objections in his submissions, later to present during tribunal.
4. Livers withheld from me the question from PIC about representation by barrister and lied to PIC that I do not want barrister.
5. Livers did not provided to PIC any of objections about lies by Ceballos.
6. Livers did not informed about Ceballos disputing legal and medical expenses. This resulted in QBE avoiding paying for most of expenses.
7. After the tribunal Livers pushed very hard to accept tribunal decision.
8. Before tribunal Livers recommended and promised to go to court after tribunal decision. However, after the tribunal he did everything in his power to prevent me from appealing tribunal decision.

Actions that supplements supposition of corruption, but could potentiality be explained by some extreme negligence:

1. Livers did not collected any information required for my claim.
2. Livers dragged time missing important deadlines
3. Livers significantly misled about his expertise or intentionally provided bad advices
4. Livers sent his bill before all procedures related to claim were finished and potentially before some of his misconduct becomes appearent

Failure to provide key information for my claim

I provided information about lies from Ceballos, QBE solicitor. Livers was very insistent that I do not present this information in written form. Instead, he promised to do it himself. He was changing his

2023-11-21

I got access to PIC portal and download QBE application for damages on PIC portal APP-10268809. One of the files was insurers submissions by Ceballos. It contains a lot of errors and fraudulent statements.

Files: "A1 Insurers submission.pdf"

2023-01-24

I signed authority to act for Peter Livers and he signed agreement that his fees will be limited to regulated costs recoverable from the insurance company.

File: "2023-01-24 Peter Livers agreement.pdf"

2023-01-31

I sent an email to Peter Livers with detailed overview of my claim. I start my email with the following "An appointment of a member to assess insurance application for compensation and damages APP-10268809 may force us to act quicker than it may have appeared before. This application contains only issuance submissions with lots of errors that can easily be disproved but at the current time, there is no reply from my side in PIC. I am sure we need to submit our reply (application) before the conference with the PIC member.". In email I provide summary of errors highlighting the most important ones. I also attach detailed list of errors and supporting evidence.

Files: "2023-01-31 email to Livers - Short summary of my claim situation.pdf" and "Reply Claim assessment and resolution service.pdf"

2024-02-26

I wrote to Peter Livers that I am submitting a complaint to HCCC about errors in Moodley report that Ceballos relies in his submissions. I provided summary in my email mentioning some examples of incorrect statements by Moodley some of which made to Ceballos submissions. I asked "I do not know if it can affect my insurance claim, but Timothy relies on this report heavily."

File

2023-04

I met with Livers and to ask what I can write in my statement. I wanted to mention that QBE did not pay for any treatment. They promised to pay, but then did not. QBE took 3 years to reply about liability while even according to them they were required to do that within 3 months. QBE kept sending me to different assessments but refused to share their reports. I was told by Law Partners that a right to share any assessment reports only if it suits them. If QBE is not happy wit the report they can simply send me to another assessor till they will get assessment that suits them he explained to me that I can write in my statement about the impact of the injury, but not about mishandling of my claim by QBE.

2023-04-25

I wrote to Livers asking why he has removed any mentioning of lies provided by Ceballos. It has been re-traumatising experience, and it was important to mention in my statement. So previously I wrote in my statement: 55. Trauma has altered my perception of reality, so that when I read Moodley or Ceballos lies about me it is not just a lie, I feel that it is a threat to my life. I asked Livers: You stroke it out. I understand that this statement is about my life rather than about their misconduct. Seeing danger everywhere is one of the symptoms of PTSD. I just wanted to give an example and explanation of it. Can I rephrase it somehow, so that it remains useful?

File "2023-04-25 email to Livers - few questions in your notes about statement.pdf"

2023-04-25

I spoke with Livers, and he advised me to avoid complaint about QBE and previous lawyers. I wrote to Livers highlighting the argument that it is important to mention my struggle with QBE and previous lawyers as it is a part of my trying to get over PTSD. I was worried that leaving it out will make it look that I was not putting all my effort in attempts to get better and as result to return to work force. As all these efforts would go to working full time if I would not been injured and this is big part of loss of income.

File "2023-04-25 email to Livers - Mentioning QBE and previous lawyers in my statement.pdf"

2023-04-26

I had conversation with Livers. He convicted me that he will include all the dispute of Ceballos statements in his statement. I also agreed not to include whole complaint that I wrote about Moodley, but instead I will include short summary. I sent summary in email.

Files "2023-04-26 email to Livers - Update of statement with summary for Moodley report errors used by QBE.pdf"

2024

I wrote a request to fix obvious errors. Livers insisted that I also have to accept determination.

files communications with Livers and request to

2024

I have sent confirmation that I accepted corrupted tribunal decision due to health reasons.

File accepting decision

False promise to go to court

who was telling me all the time that I should not be worrying and spending so much effort on PIC assessment as we he strongly recommends going to court after assessment. However, after assessment suddenly after I got terrible result and asked OK, lets go to court

Not being able to cope

This injustice intensified my PTSD symptoms so much that I was consonantly overwhelmed by panic attacks. I could not think at all. My body went into autopilot mode with only one task - survive.

Negligent management of the claim

There were actions or lack of actions by Livers that perfectly fits corruption scheme, but could be explained by very high level of negligence, if not the other actions that can be explain only by corruption.