OLSC denied request for information: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Writing a complaint to Office of the NSW Legal Services Commissioner | OLSC]] seems to be very corrupt organisation that protect dodgy lawyers instead of keeping them accountable for their misconduct. | [[Writing a complaint to Office of the NSW Legal Services Commissioner | OLSC]] seems to be very corrupt organisation that protect dodgy lawyers instead of keeping them accountable for their misconduct. | ||
== Summary == | |||
# I submitted complaints about lawyers Potts, Pryde, de Luca-Leonard, Campbell, Livers, Ceballos | # I submitted complaints about lawyers Potts, Pryde, de Luca-Leonard, Campbell, Livers, Ceballos | ||
# OLSC dismissed my complains and in the dismissals they relied on replies from lawyers. | # OLSC dismissed my complains and in the dismissals they relied on replies from lawyers. | ||
Revision as of 01:17, 12 May 2026
OLSC seems to be very corrupt organisation that protect dodgy lawyers instead of keeping them accountable for their misconduct.
Summary
- I submitted complaints about lawyers Potts, Pryde, de Luca-Leonard, Campbell, Livers, Ceballos
- OLSC dismissed my complains and in the dismissals they relied on replies from lawyers.
- OLSC did not provide me any information about responses from lawyers
- This creates unequal situation where lawyers are given unfair advantage, they get my complains, but I do not get any of their responses
- I submitted a GIPA application 2026-01-19 RTI2627934-20260119214224.pdf asking for lawyers' responses to my complaints. There has been no response yet. (Point 6)
- The OLSC complaint management process lacks basic transparency. The lawyers I complain get my complaints, but I can not get their responses, while it impacts the OLSC decision.