Law Partners personal injury firm: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The list of problems is very long. I have 2 complaints against them with [[Writing a complaint to Office of the NSW Legal Services Commissioner#Law Partners | Office of the NSW Legal Services Commissioner]]. | The list of problems is very long. I have 2 complaints against them with [[Writing a complaint to Office of the NSW Legal Services Commissioner#Law Partners | Office of the NSW Legal Services Commissioner]]. | ||
== Law Partners bill == | |||
# '''Charge for all phone calls and emails twice''': as part of other items and additionally individually just calls or correspondence, even if by the contract they were already covered by other items and should not be charged additionally (items: 1, 2, 3, 5). | |||
# '''Charge for the tasks they have not performed''', but simply asked the client to provide final information (item 4). | |||
# I had a look at 34 general communication items: '''7 have no correspondence''', '''6 were just notifications of appointments''', for '''notification of one appointment''' with Dr Khan they '''charge 4 times'''. None of them should have been charged based on the contract. | |||
# They made 2 mathematical errors and charge extra '''$3,210.01'''. | |||
[[Analysis of Law Partners itemized bill]] ''(incomplete)'' | [[Analysis of Law Partners itemized bill]] ''(incomplete)'' | ||
Revision as of 09:10, 12 December 2023
I been a client of Law Partners personal injury firm from 2018-04 till 2020-06. After the injury itself this is the second thing I wish that would not happened in my life. For me dealing with Law Partners was truly retraumatizing experience. It started path of the misery that I still can not get out of.
I was represented by solicitor Gillian Potts and barrister Ken Pryde, who technically is not a part a part of Law Partners, but according to himself works with them a lot.
The list of problems is very long. I have 2 complaints against them with Office of the NSW Legal Services Commissioner.
Law Partners bill
- Charge for all phone calls and emails twice: as part of other items and additionally individually just calls or correspondence, even if by the contract they were already covered by other items and should not be charged additionally (items: 1, 2, 3, 5).
- Charge for the tasks they have not performed, but simply asked the client to provide final information (item 4).
- I had a look at 34 general communication items: 7 have no correspondence, 6 were just notifications of appointments, for notification of one appointment with Dr Khan they charge 4 times. None of them should have been charged based on the contract.
- They made 2 mathematical errors and charge extra $3,210.01.
Analysis of Law Partners itemized bill (incomplete)